The Pipes lecture may be a turning point in the College’s history, at least one would hope.
In today’s D, non-Reviewers calling for civil discourse, more political balance/neutrality, and voicing concern about Safety & Security’s noticeable presence at what should be just one of many provocative or at least non-left-wing lectures.
I hope these two op-eds are signs that even those on the Left are starting to realize and vocalize their desire for a more realistic American world view (i.e. what most or many Americans think on a given issue).
Be the first to comment on "An unexpected result of the Pipes lecture?"