Mastering
the Lindy Hop
by
Jeffrey Hart
Nine years in preparation,
A. Scott Berg's biography of Charles Lindbergh is a
masterly work. He is the first to have been granted full
access to the Lindbergh archive at Yale all twenty
thousand boxes of it; Lindbergh saved everything
as well as the Anne Morrow Lindbergh collection, and much
else.
He handles the weight of his scholarship with notable
grace. His prose is a pleasure, not only lucid but rising
to lyricism when the moment requires it. The subject of
his first biography, the great editor Maxwell Perkins,
would thoroughly approve.
Because he knows his subject so well, Mr. Berg is in a
position to comment on the various problems and questions
about Lindbergh, and he does so with assurance and good
judgment. I will come to this in a moment.
But one subject he does not address, at least not
directly, is just why Lindbergh's 1927 flight to Paris
made him such a colossal hero. He had courage, he
navigated, and, most of all, he stayed awake. But the
utter mass adulation does seem to me out of proportion to
the achievement.
Perhaps it had to do with the special spirit of that
era. It has always struck me as appropriate that during
that same year, 1927, Babe Ruth hit his sixty home-runs,
and became another larger than life figure, the
Sultan of Swat, the Big Bambino.
Lindbergh became the Lone Eagle,
Lucky Lindy, and people danced the
Lindy Hop and chewed Baby Ruth
candy bars. Though Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa seem to be
fine fellows and have surpassed Ruth, they will not
become the mythic figure that Ruth remains, and the
astronauts who walked on the Moon will not resemble
Lindbergh.
In 1927, I will speculate, something in the era wanted
and evoked the Hero. We have great football players
today, but our sports writers don't speak of them as
Grantland Rice did about Rockne's Four
Horsemen: Outlined against a blue-grey
October sky, the Four Horsemen rode again. Of
course their names were Layden, Crowley, Miller and
Stuhldreyer but Rice immortalized them.
The Fighter was the Manassa Mauler, Jack
Dempsey; the Golfer was Bobby Jones; the Tennis Player
was Big Bill Tilden, seven singles
championships during the 1920s.
It has been called the Age of Ballyhoo, which we call
hype, but there was substance too. The year 1925 saw the
publication of Hemingway's In Our Time, Drieser's An
American Tragedy, and Fitzgerald's Great Gatsby. Eliot,
Stevens, Pound, Frost, Moore, Cummings, Crane were poets.
Anything was possible, America was the strongest nation,
the Stock Market went up, up, up and people sang It
Ain't Gonna Rain No More. It seems a champagne high
of unlimited promise.
I would now like to touch on some of the main issues
raised by the Lindbergh biography.
Five years after The Flight, with some awful
inevitability, the Lindbergh baby died in a kidnap
attempt.
Possibility was closing down, this was the Depression.
Some still doubt that Hauptmann was the criminal, but Mr.
Berg shows that he was. The evidence is mountainous. The
trial, of course, was a media sensation, a circus, but
the verdict was correct.
Lindbergh established himself as an airline consultant
and also did some useful work in applied science.
For example, he invented a heart pump which would keep
the organ functioning during an operation and this was
exhibited at the 1939-1940 New York World's Fair.
He worked on cell biology with the visionary French
scientist Alexis Carrel. Mr. Berg does not say so, but
there is something a little chilly here in Lindbergh's
attraction to machines and in his science or scientism.
One guesses he prefers the company of machines and
instrumets to human association.
With stubborn strong-mindedness, he got in way over
his head in international politics. It was not that he
favored staying out of the looming European war. That was
a majority position until Pearl Harbor. But Lindbergh was
drawn positively toward the regime in Germany, admiring
its technocratic achievements, energy, panache. He did
not like its irrational anti-Semitism, but mistakenly saw
that as incidental.
He correctly warned about the power of the Luftwaffe,
but did so in tones that made it sound irresistable,
mistakenly said it could destroy Paris and London, and
wildly over-rated the JU-88 Stuka dive bomber, a
slow-moving death trap useful only against inferior
Russian planes. It did not help at all that Anne Morrow
Lindbergh wrote a silly book entitled The Wave of
the Future, discounting democracy. It is not on
record that Lindbergh checked out a British Spitfire.
In 1938 I was eight years old and knew little about
the Sudenten Germans or the Polish
Corridor, but I did listen to Hitler speeches from
Berlin, translated in the flat tones of the BBC.
Even an eight year-old knew Hitler was bad news. His
voice rose from a growl and a sneer to near hysterical
shrieking as the audience wildly screamed Sieg
Heil. I knew these were not Fireside Chats.
Lindbergh completely misread what was going on.
After Pearl Harbor, Lindbergh served effectively as an
aviation advisor in the Pacific, flying with the
fighters, coaching tactics, and even engaging in dog
fights.
FDR remained his vindictive foe, against the best
interest of the war effort, given Lindbergh's undoubted
technical genius.
About Lindbergh himself, one of my boyhood heroes, I
have developed some reservations. In many ways he is
admirable.
He achieved much, and he wrote well. He was something
of a home-made philosopher a recurring American
type, as in Mark Twain and Ezra Pound. Autodidacticism
has its limitations.
But also there is his fanactical precisionism, his
perfectioniam, his endless check-lists about things
other people must do, his unconscious bullying, his
absence of humor, and much more than a touch of
philistinism.
His wife felt the limits of all this so severly that
she fell Platonically but deeply in love with Antoine de
Sainte-Exupery, the poetical French aviator who, though
bald and dumpy, could feel. She was
devastated when he was killed in 1940. When Lindbergh
died of cancer in 1974, his last check-list covered every
detail of his grave and funeral in Hawaii.
I suppose I admire Lindbergh without much liking him.
Surely his privacy would have nothing to fear from me.
On the other hand, I'm not Swedish.
|