Debating Nothing

In another seminal piece in today’s Daily D, guest contributor Patrick Mattimore ’72, in an op-ed piece, rants against legacy admissions. Not only does he spend the first half of the article raving against George Bush for some slightly-relevant reason, but he finishes up with inspiring conclusion: “I have no intention of debating the merits of either side’s arguments.” This statement comes, of course, after a laundry-list of arguments for and against various types of admissions preferences, and still fails to draw a conclusion. Is news in the summer really so slow that the D has to publish crap like this?